Datasets:
Languages:
English
Size:
< 1K
Tags:
state-estimation-anomaly
uav-anomaly
anomaly-detection
fault-detection
multivariate-time-series
uav-anomaly-dataset
DOI:
License:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ The dataset is structured as a collection of multivariate time-series sequences.
|
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
### Use Cases
|
| 57 |
- Benchmarking multivariate time-series anomaly detection algorithms.
|
| 58 |
-
- Developing predictive maintenance and fault identification systems for
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
#### Data Collection and Processing
|
| 61 |
-
Data was harvested from a fleet of custom-built, PX4-based
|
| 62 |
- **Hardware:** Multiple airframes with variations in motor sizes, weights, and sensor suites. Check paper for hardware details.
|
| 63 |
- **Environments:** Flight missions conducted in indoor hangars, warehouses, and open outdoor spaces.
|
| 64 |
|
|
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Data was harvested from a fleet of custom-built, PX4-based quadrotors.
|
|
| 66 |
Annotation was performed via **Physically-Constrained Expert Evaluation**. Human experts identified state estimation divergences by comparing autopilot estimates with real-world observed outcomes. Labels were verified against physical flight dynamics to ensure the statistical anomalies correlate with actual physical events.
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
### Bias, Risks, and Limitations of Data Collection
|
| 69 |
-
- **Platform Specificity:** Limited to multi-rotor dynamics
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
## DATASET STATISTICS
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
### Use Cases
|
| 57 |
- Benchmarking multivariate time-series anomaly detection algorithms.
|
| 58 |
+
- Developing predictive maintenance and fault identification systems for UAVs.
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
#### Data Collection and Processing
|
| 61 |
+
Data was harvested from a fleet of custom-built, PX4-based UAVs.
|
| 62 |
- **Hardware:** Multiple airframes with variations in motor sizes, weights, and sensor suites. Check paper for hardware details.
|
| 63 |
- **Environments:** Flight missions conducted in indoor hangars, warehouses, and open outdoor spaces.
|
| 64 |
|
|
|
|
| 66 |
Annotation was performed via **Physically-Constrained Expert Evaluation**. Human experts identified state estimation divergences by comparing autopilot estimates with real-world observed outcomes. Labels were verified against physical flight dynamics to ensure the statistical anomalies correlate with actual physical events.
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
### Bias, Risks, and Limitations of Data Collection
|
| 69 |
+
- **Platform Specificity:** Limited to multi-rotor dynamics. Limited outdoor flights with GPS availability.
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
## DATASET STATISTICS
|