text: watch jill stein explain work force recount state use democrat strongholds https //youtu.be/ajxjj7r8uyuas ms. stein start answer cnn interview video would anyone want count vote sure count accurately know lot hack take place around election much equipment use open hack basically invite hack malfeasance tamper human error etc 10 reason horrible idea:1 vote count integrity real experts believe recount need describe detroit free press report say scientists believe identify questionable trend clinton perform bad wisconsin counties rely electronic vote machine compare paper ballot optical scanners clear report michigan pennsylvania reportedly cite scientists.chris thomas longtime director michigan bureau elections say michigan use electronic vote machine identify report source potential hack entire paper optical scan state thomas tell free presswednesday nothing connect internet zero proof actual hack malware illegal tamper vote state examples give report hypothetical possibilities discuss well election know equipment limitations election take place stein word let clear evidence fraud stein say smoke gun election surround hack politics real motivation recount truly election integrity improve public confidence process include recount new hampshire nevada state clinton narrow margins new hampshire clinton 2,700 vote small margin victory state nevada hillary clinton margin victory 26,000 vote far less trump margin victory pennsylvania.4 threshold recount likely reach pennsylvania would need evidence widespread voter fraud court-ordered recount pa. example candidate actually file vote recount pennsylvania law instead would challenge county board regard vote computations state appeal judge would rule statewide recount necessary mean clinton campaign case ms. stein team would either request recount petition every vote district present prima facie case show voter fraud prima facie low threshold beyond reasonable doubt judge would rule fraud probably occur order call recount however jill stein say evidence fraud.further article explain trouble clinton supporters want ask pennsylvania recount past recount yield shift couple hundred vote certainly enough overturn anything pennsylvania clinton team would rely prove massive voter fraud enough pennsylvania court rule entire state invalid unprecedented nearly impossible feat.5 people give millions dollars cause waste money base upon many flaw assumptions hop dream unrealistic doubt people want hillary clinton win see longshot possibility however deceive mislead base generalities election hack risk know many months prior election.just email hack hillary clinton server email account hack relate election way prove vote machine hack count tamper state give false hope people similar collect money promise white christmas children miami even call scam although would go far website point fine print allow stein campaign keep money even recount do guarantee recount happen state target pledge demand recount state raise need surplus also go toward election integrity efforts promote vote system reform.6 recount set dangerous precedent future elections potentially many areas life anyone question number base upon view maybe hack somewhere somehow almost data question use type superficial analysis think go along line turn enough rock bind find something right yes one fear actually give cybersecurity pros bad name if/when experts make type claim huge caveats create numerous opportunities deny responsibility new threshold potential hack use litmus test areas life exclude j. alex halderman word year deviations pre-election poll result cyberattack probably believe likely explanation poll systematically wrong rather election hack reaction really case go public use logic many cybersecurity roles regard security incidents government would fire least send back reexamine specific detail go public might pr stunt people get attention state involve extensive certification process procedures follow say back nov. know election outcomes hillary clinton lead poll trust vote many reason still believe unless specific facts show otherwise anyone clam fraud election problems need come forward real evidence poll wrong evidence election fraud.8 recount improve integrity confidence election jill stein claim imagine process move forward recount begin one state numerous global reporters rush state involve watch process unfold live tv hopefully coverage quite intense exhaust florida recount 2000 focus dominate news weeks hear assort experts offer theories opinions select facts regard go expect happen next hillary clinton could actually become next president donald trump rabbit trail followed.i suspect extensive scrutiny may actually low raise level confidence elections change overall outcome winner.9 government resources divert time energy money take away government project assume actual cost effort pay money raise stein government staff still require pull meaningful project priorities complete recount process coordination project management immense untold number relate impacts.as article explain cost paper ballot recount precinct michigan 125 stein really think total process completely do 125 per precinct government cost include think extra money time spend come somewhere else government.10 country move important process unite move forward focus govern next president unite state effort major distraction bring uncertainty time need nation many right claim recount effort come sore losers admit defeat sure whether agree analysis doubt recount extend election uncertainty long fuel anger.final thoughtsthe u.s. department homeland security obama administration help state election team least 46 state come even imply hack voter machine occur think would raise red flag expect wrongdoing meanwhile jill stein every legal right request recount make smart right thing recount result claiming.worse name russians point unknown hackers reason recount open governments plethora current future problems witness sad close 2016 presidential election drive hypothetical hack scenarios base lie pollsters get result expect someone must hacked.finally doubt state need improvements vote machine use process follow count vote improvements begin immediately upcoming elections 2017 beyond audit describe wire magazine make sense move forward.nevertheless cybersecurity pros must extra careful often cry hack never throw maybe perhaps cover track deny accountability later.for entire story government technology 10 reason vote recount really bad idea america
input: Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: watch jill stein explain work force recount state use democrat strongholds https //youtu.be/ajxjj7r8uyuas ms. stein start answer cnn interview video would anyone want count vote sure count accurately know lot hack take place around election much equipment use open hack basically invite hack malfeasance tamper human error etc 10 reason horrible idea:1 vote count integrity real experts believe recount need describe detroit free press report say scientists believe identify questionable trend clinton perform bad wisconsin counties rely electronic vote machine compare paper ballot optical scanners clear report michigan pennsylvania reportedly cite scientists.chris thomas longtime director michigan bureau elections say michigan use electronic vote machine identify report source potential hack entire paper optical scan state thomas tell free presswednesday nothing connect internet zero proof actual hack malware illegal tamper vote state examples give report hypothetical possibilities discuss well election know equipment limitations election take place stein word let clear evidence fraud stein say smoke gun election surround hack politics real motivation recount truly election integrity improve public confidence process include recount new hampshire nevada state clinton narrow margins new hampshire clinton 2,700 vote small margin victory state nevada hillary clinton margin victory 26,000 vote far less trump margin victory pennsylvania.4 threshold recount likely reach pennsylvania would need evidence widespread voter fraud court-ordered recount pa. example candidate actually file vote recount pennsylvania law instead would challenge county board regard vote computations state appeal judge would rule statewide recount necessary mean clinton campaign case ms. stein team would either request recount petition every vote district present prima facie case show voter fraud prima facie low threshold beyond reasonable doubt judge would rule fraud probably occur order call recount however jill stein say evidence fraud.further article explain trouble clinton supporters want ask pennsylvania recount past recount yield shift couple hundred vote certainly enough overturn anything pennsylvania clinton team would rely prove massive voter fraud enough pennsylvania court rule entire state invalid unprecedented nearly impossible feat.5 people give millions dollars cause waste money base upon many flaw assumptions hop dream unrealistic doubt people want hillary clinton win see longshot possibility however deceive mislead base generalities election hack risk know many months prior election.just email hack hillary clinton server email account hack relate election way prove vote machine hack count tamper state give false hope people similar collect money promise white christmas children miami even call scam although would go far website point fine print allow stein campaign keep money even recount do guarantee recount happen state target pledge demand recount state raise need surplus also go toward election integrity efforts promote vote system reform.6 recount set dangerous precedent future elections potentially many areas life anyone question number base upon view maybe hack somewhere somehow almost data question use type superficial analysis think go along line turn enough rock bind find something right yes one fear actually give cybersecurity pros bad name if/when experts make type claim huge caveats create numerous opportunities deny responsibility new threshold potential hack use litmus test areas life exclude j. alex halderman word year deviations pre-election poll result cyberattack probably believe likely explanation poll systematically wrong rather election hack reaction really case go public use logic many cybersecurity roles regard security incidents government would fire least send back reexamine specific detail go public might pr stunt people get attention state involve extensive certification process procedures follow say back nov. know election outcomes hillary clinton lead poll trust vote many reason still believe unless specific facts show otherwise anyone clam fraud election problems need come forward real evidence poll wrong evidence election fraud.8 recount improve integrity confidence election jill stein claim imagine process move forward recount begin one state numerous global reporters rush state involve watch process unfold live tv hopefully coverage quite intense exhaust florida recount 2000 focus dominate news weeks hear assort experts offer theories opinions select facts regard go expect happen next hillary clinton could actually become next president donald trump rabbit trail followed.i suspect extensive scrutiny may actually low raise level confidence elections change overall outcome winner.9 government resources divert time energy money take away government project assume actual cost effort pay money raise stein government staff still require pull meaningful project priorities complete recount process coordination project management immense untold number relate impacts.as article explain cost paper ballot recount precinct michigan 125 stein really think total process completely do 125 per precinct government cost include think extra money time spend come somewhere else government.10 country move important process unite move forward focus govern next president unite state effort major distraction bring uncertainty time need nation many right claim recount effort come sore losers admit defeat sure whether agree analysis doubt recount extend election uncertainty long fuel anger.final thoughtsthe u.s. department homeland security obama administration help state election team least 46 state come even imply hack voter machine occur think would raise red flag expect wrongdoing meanwhile jill stein every legal right request recount make smart right thing recount result claiming.worse name russians point unknown hackers reason recount open governments plethora current future problems witness sad close 2016 presidential election drive hypothetical hack scenarios base lie pollsters get result expect someone must hacked.finally doubt state need improvements vote machine use process follow count vote improvements begin immediately upcoming elections 2017 beyond audit describe wire magazine make sense move forward.nevertheless cybersecurity pros must extra careful often cry hack never throw maybe perhaps cover track deny accountability later.for entire story government technology 10 reason vote recount really bad idea america