text: andrew korybko durantrump aggressive usual yesterday say rule military option venezuela international media go haywire speculate president consider invasion nothing justify trump say take aside moral considerations statement surprise interestingly enough might even backfire him.all us presidents routinely restate rhetoric options table deal crises country provoke abroad case hybrid war venezuela seek attain proxy control world large oil reserve orinoco river belt smash socialist-multipolar alba grouping.venezuela preexist socio-political vulnerabilities institutional weaknesses exploit us economic machinations country order trigger color revolution government fail regime change movement transform urban insurgency recently expand operations stag terrorist attack military base central part country.it likely situation devolve externally trigger civil war eventual intent spark military coup attempt president maduro odds us directly intervene scenario slim rather trump threaten military option probably relate lead behind role us slat play use colombia regional partner funnel weapons form assistance moderate rebel venezuela use turkey vis-a-vis syria past six years additionally confidently assume cia hard work try engineer desire military coup though chance success unlikely unless hybrid war become full-fledged externally trigger civil war like syria two interconnect reason explain trump mean refuse rule military option though admittedly extreme case discount whereby humanitarian intervention vary scale unleash final stag crisis order decisively topple government weak moment.no matter us ultimately however trump braggadocious statement might actually backfire increase president maduro appeal among on-the-fence members so-called opposition one thing detest elect leader hope downfall another actively support foreign invasion one country hemisphere traditional hegemon especially give us bloody history military activity americas across past century.trump comment therefore put us regime change proxies bind catch dilemma support world large perceive threat invade country support legitimate leader riot months already average anti-government supporter presume equally maduro speculate us invasion country opposition riot want hold snap elections hope peacefully carry regime change.they back opposition point however saw least-bad option available trump imply military threat essentially expose act tip spear possible invasion see chaotic civil war condition us could conventionally intervene venezuela would due intensify hybrid war actions.this fact rightly give pause self-identifying patriotic opposition members prompt reconsider least-bad normative assessment previously give opposition engage serious self-reflection see actually president maduro least bad two best way achieve objective regime change begrudgingly wait next democratic vote schedule held.continuing throw one weight behind opposition point tantamount openly support step need create condition trump media-hyped military options country include humanitarian intervention know proportion opposition satisfy patriotic criteria point would apply number large enough passive defection anti-government movement rank response trump threat could deal blow regime change effort.on hand approach subject cynical angle devil advocate might tangibly change much us already mind dead-set escalate hybrid war venezuela syrian-like level though would nevertheless represent important moral victory legitimate government expose opposition treasonous connivance us.in case regardless trump really mean military options comment despite whatever patriotic opposition members decide indications suggest venezuela fateful turn point come weeks decide future might end years come author geopolitical analyst andrew korybko contributor 21st century wire study international relations moscow state university international relations mgimo member expert council institute strategic study predictions people friendship university russia also work current affairs writer sputnik news host trend storm sputnik radio book hybrid war indirect adaptive approach regime change extensively analyze situations syria ukraine claim prove represent new model strategic warfare wag us.disclaimer author write publication private capacity unrepresentative anyone organization except personal view nothing write author ever conflate editorial view official position media outlet institution.read venezuela news 21st century wire russia filessupport work subscribe become member 21wire.tv trump go invade venezuela us plan could much bad
input: Your task is to classify the provided input as real or fake news. Label 0 is meant for fake news, Label 1 is for real news. TEXT: andrew korybko durantrump aggressive usual yesterday say rule military option venezuela international media go haywire speculate president consider invasion nothing justify trump say take aside moral considerations statement surprise interestingly enough might even backfire him.all us presidents routinely restate rhetoric options table deal crises country provoke abroad case hybrid war venezuela seek attain proxy control world large oil reserve orinoco river belt smash socialist-multipolar alba grouping.venezuela preexist socio-political vulnerabilities institutional weaknesses exploit us economic machinations country order trigger color revolution government fail regime change movement transform urban insurgency recently expand operations stag terrorist attack military base central part country.it likely situation devolve externally trigger civil war eventual intent spark military coup attempt president maduro odds us directly intervene scenario slim rather trump threaten military option probably relate lead behind role us slat play use colombia regional partner funnel weapons form assistance moderate rebel venezuela use turkey vis-a-vis syria past six years additionally confidently assume cia hard work try engineer desire military coup though chance success unlikely unless hybrid war become full-fledged externally trigger civil war like syria two interconnect reason explain trump mean refuse rule military option though admittedly extreme case discount whereby humanitarian intervention vary scale unleash final stag crisis order decisively topple government weak moment.no matter us ultimately however trump braggadocious statement might actually backfire increase president maduro appeal among on-the-fence members so-called opposition one thing detest elect leader hope downfall another actively support foreign invasion one country hemisphere traditional hegemon especially give us bloody history military activity americas across past century.trump comment therefore put us regime change proxies bind catch dilemma support world large perceive threat invade country support legitimate leader riot months already average anti-government supporter presume equally maduro speculate us invasion country opposition riot want hold snap elections hope peacefully carry regime change.they back opposition point however saw least-bad option available trump imply military threat essentially expose act tip spear possible invasion see chaotic civil war condition us could conventionally intervene venezuela would due intensify hybrid war actions.this fact rightly give pause self-identifying patriotic opposition members prompt reconsider least-bad normative assessment previously give opposition engage serious self-reflection see actually president maduro least bad two best way achieve objective regime change begrudgingly wait next democratic vote schedule held.continuing throw one weight behind opposition point tantamount openly support step need create condition trump media-hyped military options country include humanitarian intervention know proportion opposition satisfy patriotic criteria point would apply number large enough passive defection anti-government movement rank response trump threat could deal blow regime change effort.on hand approach subject cynical angle devil advocate might tangibly change much us already mind dead-set escalate hybrid war venezuela syrian-like level though would nevertheless represent important moral victory legitimate government expose opposition treasonous connivance us.in case regardless trump really mean military options comment despite whatever patriotic opposition members decide indications suggest venezuela fateful turn point come weeks decide future might end years come author geopolitical analyst andrew korybko contributor 21st century wire study international relations moscow state university international relations mgimo member expert council institute strategic study predictions people friendship university russia also work current affairs writer sputnik news host trend storm sputnik radio book hybrid war indirect adaptive approach regime change extensively analyze situations syria ukraine claim prove represent new model strategic warfare wag us.disclaimer author write publication private capacity unrepresentative anyone organization except personal view nothing write author ever conflate editorial view official position media outlet institution.read venezuela news 21st century wire russia filessupport work subscribe become member 21wire.tv trump go invade venezuela us plan could much bad