| --- |
| license: cc-by-2.0 |
| pretty_name: Partial orders on lattice paths from (0,0) to (12,11) |
| --- |
| |
| # Dataset Card for Partial Orders on Lattice Paths from \\((0,0)\\) to \\((12,11)\\) |
|
|
| Consider northeast lattice paths that travel along the edges |
| of a grid from \\((0, 0)\\) to \\((a, b)\\), only taking steps north and |
| east and never passing through the diagonal \\(y = \frac{b}{a}x\\), where |
| \\(a\\) and \\(b\\) are relatively prime. \[1\] defines two |
| order relations on such paths called the *matching ordering* |
| \\((\leq_M)\\) and the *Lagrange ordering* \\((\leq_L)\\), motivated by questions in |
| number theory. The matching ordering assigns a |
| number to each lattice path based on the number of perfect |
| matchings of an associated snake graph, while the Lagrange |
| ordering assigns a number to each lattice path equal to the |
| Lagrange number of a certain continued fraction. These |
| numbers each define a partial order. Mathematicians are interested in |
| better understanding the relationship between these orders \[2\]. |
|
|
| ## Background on Posets |
|
|
| A partially ordered set (*poset*) is a set \\(P\\) of objects |
| equipped with a binary relation, typically denoted \\(\leq\\), that |
| is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive. This means that |
| for all elements \\(a,b,c \in P\\): (1) \\(a \leq a\\), (2) if \\(a \leq b\\) and |
| \\(b \leq a\\), then \\(b = a\\), and (3) if \\(a \leq b\\) and \\(b \leq c\\), then \\(a \leq c\\). |
| Unlike total orders which are more familiar (e.g., \\(\mathbb{Z}\\)), in a |
| partial order some pairs of elements may be incomparable. |
| An example of a partially ordered set is the set of all subsets |
| of \\(\{1, 2, 3, 4\}\\), ordered by inclusion. This is a partial order |
| and not a total order because \\(\{1, 2\}\\) is not comparable to |
| \\(\{2, 3\}\\) or to \\(\{2, 3, 4\}\\), for example. In a poset, \\(y\\) *covers* \\(x\\) |
| if \\(y\\) is greater than \\(x\\) with respect to the ordering, and for |
| any \\(z\\) such that \\(x \leq z \leq y\\), either \\(z = x\\) or \\(z = y\\). In this |
| example, \\(\{1, 2, 4\}\\) covers \\(\{1, 2\}\\), \\(\{2, 4\}\\), and \\(\{1, 4\}\\), but not |
| \\(\{1\}\\), \\(\{2\}\\), or \\(\{4\}\\). |
|
|
| ## Dataset Details |
|
|
| This dataset contains pairs of lattice paths encoded by a sequence of \\(1\\)’s (for steps |
| east) and \\(0\\)’s (for steps north). Each pair of lattice paths |
| is a covering pair in exactly one of the two partial orders, the Lagrange order or the matching order |
| (pairs that are covers in both are few and were removed). |
| The task is to predict which partial order a covering pair belongs to. |
|
|
| **Statistics** |
| | | Lagrange | Matching | Total number of instances | |
| |----------|----------|----------|----------| |
| | Train | 93,218 | 46,976 | 140,194 | |
| | Test | 23,324 | 11,749 | 35,073 | |
|
|
| **Math question:** Characterize the relationship between the matching |
| and Lagrange orders. |
|
|
| **ML task:** Given a pair of lattice paths \\((w, w′)\\), train a |
| model that can predict whether \\(w′\\) covers \\(w\\) |
| in either the matching or Lagrange order. |
|
|
| ## Small model performance |
|
|
| We provide some basic baselines for this task. Benchmarking details can be found in the associated paper. |
|
|
| | Size | Logistic regression | MLP | Transformer | Guessing largest class | |
| |----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------| |
| | Paths from \\((0,0)\\) to \\((12,11)\\) | \\(66.5\%\\) | \\(98.6\% \pm 0.1\%\\) | \\(86.2\% \pm 14.2\%\\)| \\(66.5\%\\) | |
|
|
| The \\(\pm\\) signs indicate 95% confidence intervals from random weight initialization and training. |
|
|
| ## Further information |
|
|
| - **Curated by:** Helen Jenne |
| - **Funded by:** Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
| - **Language(s) (NLP):** NA |
| - **License:** CC-by-2.0 |
|
|
| ### Dataset Sources |
|
|
| Data generation scripts can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/lattice_path_posets). |
|
|
| - **Repository:** [ACD Repo](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/lattice_path_posets) |
|
|
| ## Citation |
|
|
| **BibTeX:** |
|
|
|
|
| @article{chau2025machine, |
| title={Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics}, |
| author={Chau, Herman and Jenne, Helen and Brown, Davis and He, Jesse and Raugas, Mark and Billey, Sara and Kvinge, Henry}, |
| journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366}, |
| year={2025} |
| } |
| |
|
|
| **APA:** |
|
|
| Chau, H., Jenne, H., Brown, D., He, J., Raugas, M., Billey, S., & Kvinge, H. (2025). Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366. |
|
|
| ## Dataset Card Contact |
|
|
| Henry Kvinge, acdbenchdataset@gmail.com |
|
|
| ## References |
|
|
| \[1\] Schiffler, Ralf. "Perfect matching problems in cluster algebras and number theory." Open Problems in Algebraic Combinatorics 110 (2024): 361.\ |
| \[2\] Apruzzese, P. J., and Kevin Cong. "On two orderings of lattice paths." arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16963 (2023). |